RT @andrewbostom: @karol Here are "laboratory data" documenting the futility of cloth mask capability as "filters" from a preeminent (niche…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: @karol Here are "laboratory data" documenting the futility of cloth mask capability as "filters" from a preeminent (niche…
RT @andrewbostom: @karol Here are "laboratory data" documenting the futility of cloth mask capability as "filters" from a preeminent (niche…
@karol Here are "laboratory data" documenting the futility of cloth mask capability as "filters" from a preeminent (niche) physics journal https://t.co/ZL1KfhTYGX
RT @tedtalksoph: @JujuliaGrace @EveryDoctorUK Your face rags do nothing to prevent transmission of covid. Hopefully this will put an end t…
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
Here’s a real doctor, not an activist saying mask are useless. @SupJaniceHahn @kathrynbarger @lapublichealth @CherryHoratio @LACountyBOS @LAUSDSup
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
Reminder, re: #CentralFallsSchoolMaskingFutility
@cliverichweeks @VictorianCHO Pretty pleeeaaassse! 😂😂😂 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@JAEIL3000 @RWBandOrange @DrSalandyinGA Oops. "Credentials!"🤪 https://t.co/zhNBplMhYo
@CDCDirector @CDCgov Good to see everyone @CDC #FollowTheScience 🤔 .. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@Joseane70151548 @oatila Falei que não respeitou com base na ciência e estudos, pois a maioria esmagadora da população usou máscaras de panos…. https://t.co/SNvgar877D
@Kegel7 😂😂😂 you’re joking right?! Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@Freedom_Yeti They do - you just needed to click on the link. Lots of science in this. https://t.co/pFpKLeh5EY
@roinnslainte 🤔 Purely theatrical. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@SolNataMD You’re a revelation! Not sure which way.. But read this, question your thoughts? Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https:/
We’d all like to know how this idiocy gets believed! Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@CDCgov Is @CDCgov anti science?? Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@DrEricDing Poll isn’t science!!! You don’t get to vote on biochemistry!! On Physics!! 😂😂😂 Physics paper Jan ‘22 Concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://
@SharkawyMD Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@tmprowell @shtweet 🤔 Illogical because Masks are useless. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@AnaCabrera Something to read on the journey 👍 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@DrEricDing @CDCgov @CDCDirector Or.. science. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@longlead Looks like science to me. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@jeremyfaust @united 👍 it’s science not religion. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@ErrataRob I don't think there's any evidence that cloth masks are better than nothing against Delta/Omicron. I've looked all over for reasonable studies on it - nothing. This study suggests 90% - 97.5% aerosols get through them: https://t.co/JbyYKcEFMm
@ASlavitt 🤔 maybe because.. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@JradRabel Explain this science to him. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@CMOfficeUP @UPGovt @myogiadityanath Or.. 🤔 .. 💡Science. Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@MoreIola @SatoriCarys https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY and https://t.co/3LsT2CBc8m. The 10-20% That’s an actual estimation of Dr lindsey Marr see that french news article https://t.co/oBuk0awWLA https://t.co/BsB8hz2xjO
@LizHighleyman “Intuitive sense” 🤔… 😂😂😂 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@JReinerMD 🤔 I think it might be because even they know it’s theatrical nonsense… Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKs
Masks don’t work 1 Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales: Physics of Fluids: Vol 34, No 3 https://t.co/PdG8nNlRaY
@HHSGov Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@Surgeon_General Eg The masks: Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@AALJaishi Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@JimRosenthal4 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@garay06 @grouchomarxismm @AudryEve @CroneyJamey @daniela127 @NYCMayor @NYCHealthCommr This is the actual science guy. Industrial Hygienists & the study of fluid mechanics, not political science https://t.co/iiqxJiPXVF
@Arwenstar I like this paper especially because Physicists don’t pull their punches! 👍👍🔥 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t
@AWokeZombie @justin_hart 👍👍👍 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@GeorgeMonbiot Sure George, sure 👍😂😂😂 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@WHOAFRO Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@twpiggott Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales https://t.co/N1Mhw8esnE
Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales https://t.co/UmtqXvO3GF
@WHOAFRO Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@ChrisCillizza Who knows what you mean by this. Anti mask? Just flailing for likes? Try some science: Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS”
@dgurdasani1 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@dgurdasani1 🤔 Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@IsabelOakeshott @t0nyyates Better yet, here's a recent study from the universities of Surrey and Bristol which found masks made from woven fabrics (the type we were all mandated to wear) are basically useless https://t.co/Rn8a6D0kgI
@hazechu 🤔 or.. science! Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@eusou1tardigrad @DiogoCe64298096 @pauladcb12 @PauloLotufo A questão não é muito complicada: tamanho do vírus x tamanho trama máscaras. O vírus ganha. https://t.co/pNQRE2Vb6A
@DrEricDing @By_CJewett Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
RT @Medic4allHuman: @NiusMarco Tu fais pas si bien dire
RT @Medic4allHuman: (1/2) Une étude scientifique récemment publiée dans la revue à comité de lecture Physics of Fluids démontre que les mas…