@VPrasadMDMPH Dr. Vinay, have you read this latest “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “It may be impossible to make good filters from woven fabrics” : https://t.co/hpmPoMao4B
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@gutchecklive @donciccio807 @denedev @WFLA @GovRonDeSantis No they're not. https://t.co/whC6CvTAEt
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@haldol Mesure pas efficace ...voir inutile selon la dernière étude disponible. Mais oui, d'accord avec vous, il ne faut pas stigmatiser les personnes qui veulent le porter. https://t.co/QFTvoIv481
Wearing cloth masks increased the spread of Covid because Fauci, cdc, and others told us they protected the vulnerable. It’s still happening. How many died because Fauci lied? (It’s so dystopian how all the conspiracy theories become true. 😐)
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: @esanzi Masking esp cloth masking is patently anti-scientific https://t.co/mCZwg99Tub
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@KashPrime Yeah..sure. Cloth masks allow 90% particles to filtrate out. https://t.co/QxtwzeEvTT
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
Average size of aerosols in breath passing out mask: 1.6µm. Average size of exhaled aerosols floating around room: 0.7 µm (smaller due to evaporation). https://t.co/lNUoTzSka4
@dianaberrent Masks don’t work. Good lord you people are dense. 🙄 https://t.co/mfznfJrARj
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@Peqzyfn @cqrson https://t.co/yPV5lx2CVV this proves your point
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: How good are cloth masks really? Paper from the journal Physics and Fluids Cloth consists of fibres twisted togethe…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales: Physics of Fluids: Vol 34, No 3 https://t.co/OIKjUNscae
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
🔹Particles just follow the air through these gaps and so few are filtered out.” 3/end Source: https://t.co/N9Rmmh9Yzb https://t.co/4ymHVL6ftM
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: @esanzi Masking esp cloth masking is patently anti-scientific https://t.co/mCZwg99Tub
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: @esanzi Masking esp cloth masking is patently anti-scientific https://t.co/mCZwg99Tub
@esanzi Masking esp cloth masking is patently anti-scientific https://t.co/mCZwg99Tub
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@Entovaa @JoeSofAmerica @baschimpf1 @roamingthought1 @libsoftiktok To the filtration efficacy: https://t.co/nCEVSOwj4G https://t.co/57a4oNUUvB
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@SenMarkey Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspo3KZF
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…