(1/2) Une étude scientifique récemment publiée dans la revue à comité de lecture Physics of Fluids démontre que les masques en tissu que des millions de pers,y compris de jeunes enfants,ont été forcées de porter sont sans effet. https://t.co/hawG5iX3KW
@Gr8SageEqlofHvn @CuppateawithDeb @FFXParentsAssoc The link to the referenced study is provided in the article itself. You could just click it. But, in typical fashion, rather than address the content, you attack the source. Being incapable of discussing t
@resistance6666 DeSantis was right from the beginning, cloth masks were useless: https://t.co/OodIEhw2jg
RT @BlogerPisarz: Niedawno opublikowane badanie naukowe w recenzowanym czasopiśmie Physics of Fluids pokazuje, że maski 😷 z materiału, do n…
👉 😷 Artykuł w czasopiśmie został opracowany przez brytyjskich fizyków powiązanych z uniwersytetami i laboratoriami w Wielkiej Brytanii, Niemczech i Francji. https://t.co/51raeZZqL6 Wyniki? 😷 👇 https://t.co/HRNGf7KWF3
Niedawno opublikowane badanie naukowe w recenzowanym czasopiśmie Physics of Fluids pokazuje, że maski 😷 z materiału, do noszenia których setki milionów ludzi, w tym małe dzieci 😷, zostały zmuszone przez rządy, są zasadniczo bezwartościowe. https://t.co/51r
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Arruda sur le port du masque au Québec - toute une mascarade. @isa_picard https://t.co/bViqRpV3Es
20 mois qu'on le dit - tous me répondant "ça aide un peu" - 10%, comme Arruda l'a dit en mars 2020 début de crise . Et n'oubliez pas, tout le monde respire le même air dans une même pièce/classe: https://t.co/zQqsfs5GUe https://t.co/GRBojYxRQN https://t.c
@GovKathyHochul I see you put an appeal into overturn the supreme Court ruling on your unconstitutional requirement. Here is an international peer reviewed study proving that cloth masks including surgical masks are useless against viruses. #dictatorHochul
Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales: Physics of Fluids: Vol 34, No 3 https://t.co/7R7YAeDIr4
Modeling the filtration efficiency of a woven fabric: The role of multiple lengthscales https://t.co/fLoriiBa80
But...it is theater. https://t.co/KfZOkIl1rc
RT @isa_picard: @LP_LaPresse Efficace a < 10% selon une des dernières études https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY
@lisa_iannattone Science told that efficiency is less than 10% https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY. And other UK study showed that mask in school are almost useless https://t.co/GTf2QSdazT. It might not fit with your narrative but science doesn’t always tell what we w
RT @isa_picard: @LP_LaPresse Efficace a < 10% selon une des dernières études https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY
@LP_LaPresse Efficace a < 10% selon une des dernières études https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY
Il est justement <10% efficace selon les dernières études medicales voir ici https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY
@reneguygrondin1 @DomCorner3 @haldol C’est plate mais ca marche a peine <10% d’efficacité selon une étude récente https://t.co/uBiTFLrtCY
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
@Boomerang0908 @margal @Surgeon_General This is what happens to viral particles when cloth/ surgical/ superior filtration but unfitted mask is used: https://t.co/rXA8YlcqMJ
RT @RyvesWilliam: @UKHSA Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE…
RT @RyvesWilliam: @UKHSA Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE…
@UKHSA Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@amymitchellart Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
@helwils_tweets @ToniaBuxton https://t.co/udXJa0xqCY It was actually a study between woven masks and surgical masks. They never said masks don't work 🤦♂️
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @isa_picard: @OursMathieu L’efficacité est < 10% selon la dernière étude. Le masque a des impacts sur la vie d’enfants et des personnes…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@minervina260 @DiannaGendi @AnnastaciaMP The research doesn't support the efficacy of masks - even surgical ones: "Researchers do not recommend surgical masks either because they are not well fitting and often leave gaps that allow should-be filtered parti
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
For woven fabric masks "our estimated efficiency is in the range 2.5%–10%...So, we conclude that due to the hierarchical structure of woven fabrics, they are expected to filter poorly. /34 https://t.co/zJ2qUVZSP2 https://t.co/WUJwVTwuYL
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
Well, duh. @GovRonDeSantis has never been more right.
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@Polit_eurOpines @DANsplained0 @SKMorefield It’s pretty clear that cloth masks are worthless when 90%+ of particles are not filtered.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
as máscaras de pano filtram muito pouco o ar contaminado, permitindo a ampla transmissão do vírus mesmo com as pessoas usando máscaras. Se for usar, use máscaras melhores como N95, PFF2, mas, mesmo assim, não espere uma alta eficácia. Fonte: https://t.c
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Mike___H____: @clatreil Une étude très récente lui donne raison. Les masques , c'est presqu'inutile. https://t.co/vq6UIyjKXc
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@BradSiroky FWIW -- new study on masks vs. cloth face coverings: https://t.co/EG6v7etMS1
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@ClubEffective @vemcg @eyeinscience @n_hold @DisabledStem Nope masks don’t work: https://t.co/16qqZ80bn7
@jarod_ormsby @VPrasadMDMPH Latest “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “It may be impossible to make good filters from woven fabrics” : https://t.co/hpmPoMao4B