RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@Eireknight @aking1023 @ChiefsfanCHI @Mr_Proctober @chrislhayes In what world do cloth masks work? You STILL buying that? You clearly have the internet. Use it. https://t.co/k1PlrAjcem
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@NancyBern18 @2668 @mareb66297 @WFLA @GovRonDeSantis @USouthFlorida "and an F in physics" https://t.co/OqYofIuhyp
@BalloonStrings @WFLA @GovRonDeSantis @USouthFlorida "Knew better" https://t.co/OqYofIuhyp
@mtlawmiami @realpuffpaffer @WFLA @GovRonDeSantis @USouthFlorida "Following the science" https://t.co/OqYofIuhyp
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @tlowdon: “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS”
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
@johndodds @statsjamie Peer reviewed study, https://t.co/9AVMtS2CxN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@skye_rtin @pitt_derek @statsjamie The research can be found here. It concludes that the filtration efficiency is between 2.5 and 10% for woven fabrics. https://t.co/9AVMtS2CxN
@theshag1 @KevinCate @GovRonDeSantis @EvanDonovan This one suggests 2-10% effective for woven masks. https://t.co/9AVMtS2CxN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@EssexPR Maybe read the actual study instead of the Fail's feeble summary ? Then ask is their model the correct one for the correct size droplets? https://t.co/0soLt9p2Er
RT @tlowdon: “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS”
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
When can we flag the fact checkers as spreading misinformation? https://t.co/mCdyvoHNAd
@danielle_mors actually the opposite is true. Masks impede communication for many that are disabled even more then the average student. Hearing impaired, children with speech issues, etc. Masks provide no benefit as they do not work! https://t.co/KioIU2oAl
HA - this comes out now.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
LÉANLO LAS VECES NECESARIAS
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
@ProudLibPat @JenniAgitator This is out today (was in preprint, now published and peer reviewed): Cloth masks useless. gapping surgical masks ineffective. Use may have aided spread. https://t.co/KUPaUJ1KZY
Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/e5MZU7jrfh
Cloth masks are useless and always have been. By wearing them, you are putting yourself and others at risk unnecessarily.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@michelletandler cloth masks provide no protection.. https://t.co/KioIU2oAlD THEY DO NOT WORK!!! PERIOD THE END
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @DaliessioVince: Yep. Masks Don’t Work. I tried to tell everyone.
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Yep. Masks Don’t Work. I tried to tell everyone.
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@ErinNudi @theofficialjmg @bethanyshondark Your own citation points out cloth masks "provide the least protection." The science says they are 2.5-10% effecient: https://t.co/H0G3vroVoR. "Not as" is a euphemism for NOT. The vast majority of the population
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@PHLPublicHealth While you have a little break from telling people what they can and cannot do (without the authority to do so), maybe take some time to learn how masks do nothing
A recently released study in Physics of Fluids journal concluded that filtration efficiency of cloth masks were 2.5-10% for particles at least 1.5 um in diameter. SARS-CoV-2 is 1000X smaller than that. Politicians pushing cloth masks: 🦗🦗🦗 https://t.co/l
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@JujuliaGrace @EveryDoctorUK Your face rags do nothing to prevent transmission of covid. Hopefully this will put an end to the perpetual virtue signalling and nauseating attention seeking. https://t.co/RodWElorVb https://t.co/RNUJOnPESx
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration efficiency of our imaged fabric is in the range 2.5%–10%" https://t.co/W2OIFaLKqW https://t.co/OcBYpEsXL2
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @banishedprotein: Who knew?
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @tlowdon: “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS”
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…