RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
We'll see lots of this now that the mandates are lifted. What was not even allowed to be discussed for two years will quietly be accepted as fact. Masks do not and cannot work.
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
This was clear 2 years ago, but always fun to float it for the masked and mad.
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @jdM273: The authories always knew masks where useless. Their purpose was only to instill fear and compliance. A Psy-op.
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Things we all knew two years ago…
The authories always knew masks where useless. Their purpose was only to instill fear and compliance. A Psy-op.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
Our amazing medical community figured out that the label on the box was true, after 2 years. Stellar.
RT @DrSkues: Fizycy ponownie udowodnili, że maski materiałowe są bezużyteczne w odfiltrowywaniu (w obie strony) wirusów przenoszonych w wyd…
Fizycy ponownie udowodnili, że maski materiałowe są bezużyteczne w odfiltrowywaniu (w obie strony) wirusów przenoszonych w wydychanym powietrzu. https://t.co/TCeDBZ8NvL @PiotrWitczak_ , @basiukiewiczpaw
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@KatieCorkern … 🧐
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
@slimslimwino @RWTaylors The source is the research paper submitted by the University of Bristol as published in Physics of Fluids. Link is https://t.co/ETOk3UhzPW It's a bit science-heavy but, being a Doctor, I'm sure you can cope 😉 See abstract below. H
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
RT @Humble_Analysis: Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you…
Prominent journal concludes that it is, literally, impossible for masks to effectively filter virus particles. If you can breathe, the virus is getting through.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@TauntonHeat @MichaelYeadon3 @SwaledaleMutton @statsjamie Here you go James. Have a read and tell me your conclusions. Take particular note of the 1.5um diameter.... Oh, .@statsjamie best you read it too. https://t.co/dfqoc2rpaR
RT @m_cortizas: Lo que ya se sabía, ahora publicado en una revista técnica "Fhysics and Fluids". Sólo habla del factor de filtración, pero…
RT @m_cortizas: Lo que ya se sabía, ahora publicado en una revista técnica "Fhysics and Fluids". Sólo habla del factor de filtración, pero…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
Lo que ya se sabía, ahora publicado en una revista técnica "Fhysics and Fluids". Sólo habla del factor de filtración, pero es concluyente, sólo los no tejidos y capas de ellos son capaces de filtrar partículas muy pequeñas.
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
@AutisticWooly @angeldvalentin @johniadarola Shocker… cloth masks allow 90% of the particles through. This just came out yesterday. https://t.co/zB1N3RHWun
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @tlowdon: “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS”
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
@ACLUVA masking that has been in place in schools does nothing to slow transmission. It cant. and univsersal PPE has never been solution for compromised students. https://t.co/rXA8YlcqMJ
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@BonnieF16806917 @CandiceBergenMP masking does not do that. It hasn't worked anywher, and the latest peer reviewed in-depth study shows viral particle escape too high to help. https://t.co/rXA8YlcqMJ
@cochraf @CandiceBergenMP You shouldn't, because neither of those things protects you. Infection and transmission occur despite vaccination at a high rate. Masks do nothing. https://t.co/rXA8YlcqMJ false protection is no protection. Better therapies, and b
@ocnj3 @ASlavitt https://t.co/rXA8YlcqMJ The type of masking in common use did nothing, and can't work against airborne viral particles enough to protect anyone,
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
@PublicHealth Except of course they don't...because masks don't stop Covid...never have...never will. https://t.co/4zuxKVd5Ev
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
@WajahatAli @DrEricDing If kids can read they can understand : Physics paper Jan ‘22 concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE GOOD FILTERS FROM WOVEN FABRICS” https://t.co/qPKspolmof
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @EricTopol: The science of mask filtration, and why cloth doesn't work very well https://t.co/3qCqLeENXN
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @doctormacias: Es preferible usar cubrebocas “quirúrgico” que cubrebocas de tela. El tejido de los de tela deja espacios demasiado grand…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
On Oct 7 2021, the authors came back with a new study on cloth masks, assuming aerosol transmission and concluding "it may be impossible to make good filters from woven fabrics". This was published March 1, 2022 (nearly 5 months from submission). https://
more studies are published showing why cloth masks haven't been effective in stopping covid
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@DarkStar7355 @JuliaHB1 The DM article isn’t the source of the science and research 🙄🙄🙄 Why don’t you read the actual scientific study that the DM article references ??? https://t.co/eVdgXfXNmM Typical covid bedwetter/Twitter warrior, can’t see the wood
@statsjamie Do you even understand the computer modeling ? Because the Daily Mail doesn't. https://t.co/oTU4RmwEFs
RT @cdoran2: Cloth masks are useless and always have been. By wearing them, you are putting yourself and others at risk unnecessarily.
RT @andrewbostom: Preeminent “Physics of Fluids” journal concludes cloth masks were/are USELESS, i.e., 2.5-10% “efficient”; “IT MAY BE IM…
@emmakennytv Computer modeling rather than actual testing. A 10% rate under what circumstances ? What rate did they stop particles escaping from the wearer ? Talking ? Shouting ? Singing ? Coughing ? Sneezing ? You do understand the research ? https://t
RT @ifihadastick: Important paper from the Physics of Fluids about the uselessness of cloth masks. "We estimate that the filtration effic…